Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.

Importance: State-specific abortion restrictions currently affect the training of approximately 44% of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents in the US. Examination of where future trainees apply for residency is important. Objective: To assess changes in the percentage of applicants to OBGYN residency programs by state based on abortion restrictions in place after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (hereafter, Dobbs v Jackson) US Supreme Court decision and examine whether applicants' preference for programs, as suggested by the distribution of application signals that express higher interest, was associated with abortion bans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This serial cross-sectional study used anonymized data for all applicants to OBGYN residency programs in the US during September and October from 2019 to 2023. Data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges Electronic Residency Application Service. Exposures: Applications and program preference signals sent to OBGYN residency programs, analyzed by applicants' self-reported demographics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was differences in the percentage of unique applicants to OBGYN residency programs from 2019 to 2023, with programs categorized by state-based abortion restrictions after the Dobbs v Jackson decision. Secondary outcomes included the distribution of program signals by state abortion ban status. Results: A total of 2463 applicants (2104 [85.4%] women) who applied to OBGYN programs for the 2023 residency match cycle were the focal sample of this study. While overall applicant numbers remained stable between 2019 and 2023, the number of applicants differed significantly by state abortion ban status in the 2022 (F2,1087 = 10.82; P < .001) and the 2023 (F2,1087 = 14.31; P < .001) match cycles. There were no differences in the number of signals received by programs in states with bans after controlling for known covariates such as number of applications received and program size, and there were no differences in the percentage of signals sent by out-of-state applicants to programs in states with different abortion laws than their home states (F2,268 = 2.41; P = .09). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, there was a small but statistically significant decrease in the number of applicants to OBGYN residency programs in states with abortion bans in 2023 compared with 2022. However, applicant signaling data did not vary by states' abortion ban status. While OBGYN residency programs almost completely filled in 2023, continued monitoring for the potential consequences of state abortion bans for OBGYN training is needed.

Program Signaling in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate how obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors used applicant signaling and to understand how two tiers of signals influenced interviews, ranking, and matching into programs. A multimethod, deductive-sequential design was employed using a national survey of residency program directors and a convenience sampling of programs to study how obstetrics and gynecology program directors used program signals in the 2022-2023 residency-application cycle. A total of 80.5% (236/293) of program directors receiving the survey provided information about signaling, and 20 programs provided application outcome data for applicants who signaled them. The majority of program directors (86.9%) opted into signaling, 43.4% used signals as part of their initial screening, and 33.1% used it as a tiebreaker after reviewing applications, with 45.4% feeling it improved their ability to conduct a holistic review and 41.5% inviting applicants they may not have invited previously. Among programs providing applicant data, the influence of signals on the chances of an applicant being interviewed varied, but an overall strong positive effect of signaling was observed across the sample. The mean rank was 42 for gold signals, 45 for silver, and 38 for no signal (F(3)=5.97, P <.001). Signaling was widely used by programs and was an effective tool to allow applicants to communicate real interest in a program. Signaling was associated with an increased likelihood of an applicant's being interviewed but did not influence an applicant's position on the rank list.

Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians.

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a disruption of in-person workforce development programs. Our immersive physician-oriented leadership institute suspended in 2020, resumed in 2021 with a virtual program, and in 2022 reconvened in-person training. We used this opportunity to compare the participant experience, including reported knowledge acquisition and ability gains, between these nearly identical curricula delivered in vastly different circumstances and formats. Participants and Methods: We describe the differences in immersive leadership training implementation and adaptations made for virtual vs in-person engagement of two cohorts of OB-GYN physicians. Data were collected from virtual (n=32) and in-person (n=39) participants via post-session surveys. Quantitative data reported includes participant ratings for knowledge gain and ability gain. Qualitative data were obtained via open-ended feedback questions per session and the overall experience. Results: Knowledge and ability scores indicated strong, statistically significant gains in both formats, with some reported learning gains higher in the virtual training. Qualitative data of participant feedback identified a number of positive themes similar across the in-person and virtual settings, with virtual participants noting how construction of the virtual program produced highly effective experiences and engagement. Constructive or negative feedback of the virtual setting included time constraint issues (eg, a desire for more sessions overall or more time per session) and technical difficulties. Positive comments focused on the effectiveness of the experience in both formats and the surprising ability to connect meaningfully with others, even in a virtual environment. However, there were also many comments clearly supporting the preference for in-person over virtual experiences. Conclusion: Immersive physician leadership training can be effectively delivered via virtual or in-person methods, resulting in significant reported gains of knowledge and skills. These programs provide valuable interpersonal connections and skills to support physician leadership. While both formats are effective, participants clearly prefer in-person leadership development experiences and interpersonal learning.

Delaying the Fellowship Start Date in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate residents planning fellowship, their preferences for fellowship start date, and the acceptability of resultant gaps in pay and insurance coverage. METHODS: A survey was conducted during the 2022 in-service training examination querying obstetrics and gynecology residents about their desire to pursue fellowship, their preferred fellowship start date (understanding the salary gap), and the acceptability of a medical insurance gap. RESULTS: Survey analysis of respondents planning to pursue fellowship demonstrated that, acknowledging the pay gap that would occur, 93.9% preferred a fellowship start date after July 1, with the majority (65.1%, 593/911) preferring an August 1 fellowship start date. Most respondents (87.7%, 798/910) found the potential resultant gap in medical insurance coverage acceptable. Survey data showed that racial and ethnic identity was not a determining factor in either of these issues. CONCLUSION: The majority of current residents planning to pursue fellowship prefer a delayed fellowship start date, even if it means a gap in salary and insurance coverage. The results of this study, requested by a specialty-wide, consensus-building workgroup, informed a statement signed by the majority (88.9%) of workgroup constituents supporting an August 1 clinical fellowship start date.

Examining Age and Postoperative Opioid Use in the Urogynecology Population: A Prospective Study.

IMPORTANCE: Surgeons must individualize postoperative pain management while also reducing the amount of unused prescribed opioids. OBJECTIVES: This study compared postoperative opioid use in younger versus older women following urogynecologic surgery. We also assessed the likelihood of women returning unused opioids for safe disposal. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study of women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery divided into 2 cohorts: younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years). Our primary outcome was total opioid use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). We also assessed the average pain score during the first week after surgery measured by a numerical pain scale (range, 0-10). Our secondary outcome was the rate of return of unused prescribed opioids at the 6-week postoperative visit utilizing a disposable drug deactivation system. RESULTS: From April 2019 to September 2021, 152 participants were enrolled: 92 (61%) in the younger cohort (mean age, 51 ± 8 years) and 60 (39%) in the older cohort (mean age, 72 ± 6 years). For our primary outcome, younger women used significantly more opioids during the first postoperative week compared with older women (49 ± 71 vs 28 ± 40 MME, respectively, P = 0.04), despite no difference in average pain scores (4 ± 2 younger vs 3 ± 2 older, P = 0.05). For our secondary outcome, 23% of participants returned their opioids for disposal with the drug deactivation system. CONCLUSIONS: Younger women had higher postoperative opioid use despite similar pain scores after urogynecologic surgery. Among those prescribed opioids, a quarter of participants returned their opioids for disposal at their postoperative visit.

Beyond opioid prescribing: Evaluation of a substance use disorder curriculum for OBGYN residents.

OBJECTIVE: Amidst the current opioid crisis, there is a need for better integration of substance use disorder screening and treatment across specialties. However, there is no consensus regarding how to best instruct OBGYN trainees in the clinical skills related to opioid and other substance use disorders (SUD). Study objectives were (1) to assess the effectiveness a SUD curriculum to improve self-reported competence among OBGYN residents and (2) to explore its effectiveness to improve attending evaluations of residents' clinical skills as well as its feasibility and acceptability from the resident perspective. METHODS: A pilot 3-session curriculum was developed and adapted to SUD screening and treatment which included readings, didactics, and supervised outpatient clinical experiences for OBGYN post-graduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents rotating through an integrated OBGYN-SUD clinic. Eighteen residents completed pre and post clinical skills self-assessments (SUD screening, counseling, referring, Motivational Interviewing) using an adapted Zwisch Rating Scale (range 1-5). Scores were compared between time points using paired t-tests. Sub-samples also (a) were evaluated by the attending on three relevant Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones (ACGME) milestone sets using the web-based feedback program, myTIPreport (n = 10) and (b) completed a qualitative interview (n = 4). RESULTS: All PGY-1s (18/18) across three academic years completed the 3-session SUD curriculum. Clinical skill self-assessments improved significantly in all areas [SUD Screening (2.44 (0.98) vs 3.56 (0.62), p = <0.01); Counseling (1.81 (0.71) vs 3.56 (0.51), p = < .01; Referring (2.03 (0.74) vs 3.17 (0.71), p = < .01; Motivational Interviewing (1.94 (1.06) vs 3.33 (0.69), p = < .01)]. Milestone set levels assigned by attending evaluations (n = 10) also improved. Qualitative data (n = 4) revealed high acceptability; all curriculum components were viewed positively, and feedback was provided (e.g., desire for more patient exposures). CONCLUSION: A pilot SUD curriculum tailored for OBGYN PGY-1 residents that goes beyond opioid prescribing to encompass SUD management is feasible, acceptable and likely effective at improving SUD core clinical skills.

Is a Postvoid Residual Necessary? A Randomized Trial of Two Postoperative Voiding Protocols.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare a backfill-assisted voiding trial (VT) with and without a postvoid residual (PVR) after pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This was a nonblinded randomized controlled trial of women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress incontinence surgery. Participants were randomized immediately after surgery to either a PVR VT or a PVR-free VT. Our primary outcome was the rate of VT failure at discharge. Secondary outcomes included days of catheterization, urinary tract infection (UTI), and prolonged voiding dysfunction. With a power of 80% and an α of 0.05, we needed 126 participants to detect a 25% difference in VT failure (60% in PVR VT vs 35% in PVR-free VT). RESULTS: Participants were enrolled from March 2017 to October 2017. Of the 150 participants, mean age was 59 years, and 33% underwent vaginal hysterectomy, 48% underwent anterior repair, and 75% underwent midurethral sling. Seventy-five (50%) were randomized to PVR VT and 75 (50%) to PVR-free VT, with no differences in baseline demographic or intraoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. Our primary outcome, VT failure, was not significantly different (53% PVR VT vs 53% PVR-free VT, P = 1.0). There were no significant differences in days of postoperative catheterization (1 [0, 4] in PVR VT vs 1 [0, 4] in PVR-free VT, P = 0.90), UTI (20% PVR VT vs 20% PVR-free VT, P = 1.0), or postoperative voiding dysfunction (4% PVR VT vs 5% PVR-free VT, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: When performing a backfill-assisted VT, checking a PVR does not affect VT failure, postoperative duration of catheterization, UTI, or voiding dysfunction.

Correlations between Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores: an initial validity study.

BACKGROUND: Since the launch of the Outcome Project in 2001, the graduate medical education community has been working to implement the 6 general competencies. In 2014, all Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs implemented specialty-specific milestones to advance competency-based assessment. Each clinical competency committee of the Obstetrics and Gynecology program assesses all residents twice a year on the milestones. These data are reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as part of a continuous quality improvement effort in graduate medical education. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and residency program graduates' performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying (written) examination. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a validity study of all graduating (postgraduate year 4) Obstetrics and Gynecology residents in 2017 within Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited United States training programs (1260 residents from 242 programs). This cohort of residents began receiving milestone assessments during their postgraduate year 2 in 2014; the first-year milestones were implemented for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited Obstetrics and Gynecology programs. This cohort completed their sixth and final milestone assessment at graduation in June 2017 for a total of 6 periods of milestone assessments. Data regarding each resident's milestone ratings in each of the 28 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education subcompetencies for Obstetrics and Gynecology were assessed for their association with candidates' American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores using a generalized estimating equation regression model. RESULTS: Data were available and analyzed from 1184 residents from 240 programs, representing 94% of the total academic year 2017 graduates of Obstetrics and Gynecology residency training programs. There was a substantial association between most milestone ratings at the 6 assessment points and candidates' performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination. The strongest associations with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology were within all 7 of the subcompetencies of Medical Knowledge (range of slope correlation coefficients at final milestone ratings 3.84-5.17; slope coefficients can be interpreted as the gain in qualifying examination points per unit increase in milestone level). At the final milestone assessment, but more modest associations with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores were also seen with 9 of the 11 Patient Care and Procedural Skills subcompetencies, the 2 of 2 Practice-Based Learning and Improvement subcompetencies, the 2 of 2 Systems-Based Practice subcompetencies, and 2 of the 3 Professionalism subcompetencies. Only 1 of the 3 Interpersonal and Communication Skills subcompetencies was associated with American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores. CONCLUSION: The pattern of associations between the qualifying examination scores and milestone ratings for the 2017 graduating cohort of Obstetrics and Gynecology residents followed a logical pattern, with the strongest associations seen in Medical Knowledge, and lower to no associations in subcompetencies not as effectively assessed on multiple-choice examinations. Although some positive associations were noted for non-Medical Knowledge milestones, these associations could be caused by correlational rating errors with further study needed to better understand these patterns.

Implementation and Initial Construct Validity Evidence of a Tool, myTIPreport, for Interactive Workplace Feedback on ACGME Milestones.

OBJECTIVE: To describe implementation of myTIPreport for milestone feedback and to initiate construct validity testing of myTIPreport for milestones. DESIGN: myTIPreport was used to provide workplace feedback on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education required milestone sets. Performance of senior learners (postgraduate year [PGY]-4s) was compared to that of junior learners (PGY-1s) to begin the process of construct validity testing for myTIPreport. SETTING: A convenience-based site selection of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: OBGYN residents and faculty. RESULTS: Amongst the 12 participating OBGYN residency programs, there were 444 unique learners and 343 unique faculty teachers. A total of 5293 milestone feedback encounters were recorded. Mean PGY-4 performance was rated higher than mean PGY-1 performance on all 25 of the compared milestone sets, with statistically significant differences seen for 19 (76%) of these 25 milestone sets and nonsignificant differences in the predicted direction observed for the other 6 milestone sets. CONCLUSIONS: myTIPreport detected differences between senior and junior learners for the majority of compared feedback encounters for OBGYN residents. Findings support the emerging construct validity of myTIPreport for milestone feedback.

Lidocaine Use in Vaginal Surgery and Risk of Toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the amount of lidocaine administered for vaginal reconstruction with versus without hysterectomy. The secondary objective was to assess the risk of lidocaine toxicity. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compares lidocaine dose in 2 cohorts: women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with additional vaginal reconstruction (VH + VR) versus those who underwent vaginal reconstruction without hysterectomy (VR only). Total intraoperative lidocaine dose included the intravenous dose from anesthesia and the vaginally injected dose from the surgeon. The risk of toxicity was defined as total dose greater than 7 mg/kg. The primary outcome was the difference in total lidocaine dose for VH + VR versus VR only. RESULTS: Among 372 women included, 140 (37.6%) were in the VH + VR group, and 232 (62.4%) in the VR-only group. For the primary outcome of total lidocaine dose between groups, VH + VR received more total lidocaine than did VR only (228 ± 105 vs 168 ± 78 mg, P < 0.001). This difference was due to the vaginal lidocaine dose (P < 0.001), with no significant difference in the intravenous lidocaine dose (P = 0.68). In a logistic regression model controlling for age, anesthesia type, sling, and anterior repair, posterior repair, and anesthesia type, VH remained an independent risk factor for increased lidocaine dose (P < 0.001). Two women received a toxic dose of lidocaine, and both were in the VH + VR group. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with additional vaginal reconstructive procedures are more likely to receive a higher dose of lidocaine compared with women undergoing vaginal reconstruction alone. The risk of lidocaine toxicity is increased with concomitant procedures.

Anesthesia myTIPreport: A Web-Based Tool for Real-Time Evaluation of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestone Competencies and Clinical Feedback to Residents.

Feedback in clinical education is essential but challenged by multiple barriers. This report describes the use of myTIPreport, a web-based tool, which streamlines the dual purpose of milestone evaluation and real-time feedback from faculty to residents in a US anesthesiology program. In a 6-month trial, faculty members and residents used myTIPreport for daily clinical feedback. We believe myTIPreport will be a valuable tool for clinical feedback given further refinement of the tool and improved faculty and resident development on program use.

Perioperative Complications Curriculum for the OB/GYN Resident: A Pilot Study.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Objectives: Our objective is to describe a process for development and implementation of a web-based curriculum addressing gynecologic perioperative complications. Methods: Residents, Fellows, and Faculty completed a needs assessment survey addressing satisfaction with baseline perioperative complications curriculum. Residents completed a knowledge pretest. Residents received weekly emails with links to developed topic-specific materials over 4 weeks. Residents completed a post-implementation survey to assess satisfaction and to retest knowledge. Results: 75% (21/28) of Residents and 47% (40/86) Fellows/Faculty completed the needs assessment. 95% (20/21) of Residents and 90% (36/40) Fellows/Faculty reported dissatisfaction with baseline perioperative complications curriculum. Ureteral injury, bowel injury, vaginal cuff dehiscence, and bladder injury were prioritized topics, while assigned readings, interactive web-based case modules, and intraoperative instruction were prioritized modalities for curriculum development. Resident pretest mean score was 72% (40-90%, SD = 15). Weekly curriculum emails were successfully distributed all Resident learners. Eighteen percent of Residents completed the post-implementation survey, with 100% reporting satisfaction with the web-based case modules. Post-test knowledge mean score was 84% (60-100%, SD = 15). Conclusion: Low satisfaction rate with baseline curriculum was reported. Materials were developed and distributed weekly to all Residents, who successfully and consistently accessed the developed web-based curriculum.

Baseline Understanding of Urinary Incontinence and Prolapse in New Urogynecology Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Investigators sought to assess whether age was related to patient understanding of pelvic floor disorders; given studies show that increased age is associated with lower health literacy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of new urogynecology patients. Enrolled participants completed a survey including demographics, history of urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and treatment, the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ), self-assessment of UI and prolapse knowledge, and a pelvic anatomy diagram to label. To achieve 80% power to detect a 2-point difference in PIKQ score, 33 subjects were required per age group (<65 and ≥65 years old). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five of 160 new urogynecologic patients completed the survey (84% response rate). Thirty-seven participants were older than 65 years, and 98 were younger than 65 years. Total PIKQ scores (maximum, 24), the primary outcome, for the older and younger groups were 15.3 and 15.0, respectively (P = 0.7). The 2 groups self-rated UI and prolapse knowledge similarly, rating knowledge as excellent, very good, or good in 60% (P = 0.3) and 40% (P = 0.2) of subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline patient understanding of UI and pelvic organ prolapse was low as assessed by PIKQ score and was not influenced by age.

myTIPreport and Training for Independent Practice: A Tool for Real-Time Workplace Feedback for Milestones and Procedural Skills.

BACKGROUND: Few tools currently exist for effective, accessible delivery of real-time, workplace feedback in the clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: We developed and implemented a real-time, web-based tool for performance-based feedback in the clinical environment. METHODS: The tool (myTIPreport) was designed for performance-based feedback to learners on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones and procedural skills. "TIP" stands for "Training for Independent Practice." We implemented myTIPreport in obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) programs between November 2014 and May 2015. Residents, fellows, teachers, and program directors completed preimplementation and postimplementation surveys on their perceptions of feedback. RESULTS: Preimplementation surveys were completed by 656 participants of a total of 980 learners and teachers in 19 programs (12 Ob-Gyn and 7 FPMRS). This represented 72% (273 of 378) of learners and 64% (383 of 602) of teachers. Seventy percent of participants (381 of 546) reported having their own individual processes for real-time feedback; the majority (79%, 340 of 430) described these processes as informal discussions. Over 6 months, one-third of teachers and two-thirds of learners used the myTIPreport tool a total of 4311 times. Milestone feedback was recorded 944 times, and procedural feedback was recorded 3367 times. Feedback addressed all ACGME Milestones and procedures programmed into myTIPreport. Most program directors reported that tool implementation was successful. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of learners successfully received workplace feedback using myTIPreport. This web-based tool, incorporating procedures and ACGME Milestones, may be an important transition from other feedback formats.

Surgical Skills Feedback and myTIPreport: Is There Construct Validity?

OBJECTIVE: To initiate construct validity testing of myTIPreport for procedural skill assessment in a prospective multicenter evaluation study. METHODS: Teachers and learners from a convenience-based site selection of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) training programs performed procedural assessments in myTIPreport. The specifically defined 5-point Dreyfus rating scale describing ability levels from novice to expert was used. Defined as the degree to which a test or measure assesses what it was designed to measure, construct validity of myTIPreport was tested by comparing the medians of procedure-specific overall assessments, by both teachers and learners themselves, of senior learners with junior learners. To minimize type I error, comparisons were performed only when a threshold of 10 or greater feedback encounters per learner group was met. Correlation of teacher assessments and learner self-assessments was examined for myTIPreport. RESULTS: From November 2014 to May 2016, 12 OBGYN and 7 FPMRS training programs participated. There were 440 learners and 443 teachers. Feedback was recorded on 5,093 surgical procedures; 4,567 for OBGYN residents and 526 for FPMRS fellows. Each OBGYN procedure had two categories of teacher and learner assessments comparing postgraduate year (PGY)-4 with PGY-1 learner performance. This yielded 48 possible assessment comparisons for the included 24 OBGYN procedures. In all, 28 of these 48 (58%) met the threshold number of observations per learner group. In 28 of these 28 (100%) comparison categories, PGY-4s rated significantly higher than PGY-1s. Similarly, in 16 of 18 (89%) comparison categories meeting inclusion criteria, FPMRS PGY-7s rated significantly higher than FPMRS PGY-5s. Strong correlation was noted of teacher assessments and learner self-assessments in myTIPreport with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.89 (P<.001). CONCLUSION: As noted for the majority of compared teacher assessments and learner self-assessments, myTIPreport appeared to detect differences between senior and junior learners. These data support the emerging construct validity of myTIPreport for procedural skills assessment.

Two techniques for assessing postoperative voiding function, a randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Post-operative voiding dysfunction is common after sling placement and is assessed with a voiding trial (VT) before discharge. We hypothesized that an operating room (OR) initiated retrograde VT (OR-fill) would decrease time to discharge compared with a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) initiated retrograde VT (PACU-fill). METHODS: This was a parallel non-blinded randomized trial, of women undergoing outpatient sling surgery at a university hospital. In the OR-fill group, fill was initiated after sling placement during cystoscopy by leaving fluid in the bladder. In the PACU-fill group, fill was initiated in the PACU. Pre-VT volumes were recorded and a PVR ≤ 100 mL defined a passed VT. The primary outcome was total PACU time, defined as arrival in PACU until discharge home. RESULTS: Thirty women were assigned to the OR-fill group and 29 to the PACU-fill group. Time from PACU arrival to VT was shorter in the OR-fill group (41.5 [31.0, 69.3] min vs 69.0 [44.0, 107.0] min, p = 0.03), but total PACU time in the groups was similar (125.0 [90.5, 180.5] min vs 131.5 [93.5, 178.0] min, p = 0.76). Bladder volume before VT was greater in the OR-fill group (557.3 ± 187.3 mL vs 433.0 ± 171.2 mL, p = 0.01). VT pass rates of the two groups were not significantly different (OR-fill 16.7% vs PACU-fill 24.1%, p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: OR-fill VT did not decrease total PACU time compared with PACU-fill VT. No overdistension was seen in either group; transient postoperative voiding dysfunction was common.

Taking Care of Our Own: A Multispecialty Study of Resident and Program Director Perspectives on Contributors to Burnout and Potential Interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Rates of resident physician burnout range from 60 to 76 % and are rising. Consequently, there is an urgent need for academic medical centers to develop system-wide initiatives to combat burnout in physicians. Academic psychiatrists who advocate for or treat residents should be familiar with the scope of the problem and the contributors to burnout and potential interventions to mitigate it. We aimed to measure burnout in residents across a range of specialties and to describe resident- and program director-identified contributors and interventions. METHODS: Residents across all specialties at a tertiary academic hospital completed surveys to assess symptoms of burnout and depression using the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, respectively. Residents and program directors identified contributors to burnout and interventions that might mitigate its risk. Residents were asked to identify barriers to treatment. RESULTS: There were 307 residents (response rate of 61 %) who completed at least one question on the survey; however, all residents did not respond to all questions, resulting in varying denominators across survey questions. In total, 190 of 276 residents (69 %) met criteria for burnout and 45 of 263 (17 %) screened positive for depression. Program directors underestimated rates of burnout, with only one program director estimating a rate of 50 % or higher. Overall residents and program directors agreed that lack of work-life balance and feeling unappreciated were major contributors. Forty-two percent of residents reported that inability to take time off from work was a significant barrier to seeking help, and 25 % incorrectly believed that burnout is a reportable condition to the medical board. CONCLUSIONS: Resident distress is common and most likely due to work-life imbalance and feeling unappreciated. However, residents are reluctant to seek help. Interventions that address work-life balance and increase access to support are urgently needed in academic medical centers.

Workforce Analysis of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015 to 2045.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess how the projected increase in prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) will impact the number of patients per female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) subspecialist between 2015 and 2045. METHODS: We performed a workforce analysis of FPMRS subspecialists in the United States by developing a model to predict the number of FPMRS subspecialists in 5-year increments from 2015 to 2045. Our model allowed for selection of the number of current FPMRS subspecialists, the number and sex of new FPMRS subspecialists added per year, and retirement age of FPMRS subspecialists. The number of women with PFDs from 2015 to 2045 was then predicted by applying published, age-specific prevalence rates to the 2012 US Census Projections for women aged 20 years or older. For our primary outcome, we divided the projected number of patients by the projected number of FPMRS subspecialists every 5 years from 2015 to 2045. RESULTS: The model predicts the number of FPMRS subspecialists will increase from 1133 to 1514 with a sex shift from 46% female to 81% female between 2015 and 2045. The number of women with ≥1 PFD is predicted to increase from 31.4 million in 2015 to 41.9 million in 2045. For our primary outcome, the number of patients per FPMRS subspecialist is projected to range from 27,870 in 2015 to 27,650 in 2045. CONCLUSIONS: The current ratio of patients per FPMRS subspecialist appears high and is predicted to remain near current levels over the next 30 years. These projections support the need for continued training of physicians skilled in treating PFDs.

Internet Use Among Urogynecology Patients in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVES: Given limited information regarding digital technology use among patients, we sought to evaluate Internet use among younger (<65 years) as compared to older (≥65 years) women and to assess factors associated with Internet use. METHODS: We administered an anonymous questionnaire on digital technology use to English-speaking women who presented to our Urogynecology practice during a 1-month period. The questionnaire assessed the following sociodemographics: age, race, education, income, and insurance status. For our primary outcome, we assessed Internet use among younger versus older women. We also conducted a logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association of age with Internet use, while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 556 women presented during the study period. Among these women, 506 completed the survey, for a 91% response rate. There were 282 (55.7%) younger women and 222 (43.9%) older women. Most of the younger and older cohorts were white (77% vs 86.5%, P = 0.02). Younger women were more educated (79.8% vs 59.5% ≥ college education; P < 0.0001) and had a higher income (58.3% vs 39.8% ≥ $50,000; P < 0.0001). For our primary outcome, younger women were significantly more likely to use the Internet (93.8% vs 66.3%, P < 0.001). In a logistic regression model which adjusted for age, race, education, and income, younger women remained significantly more likely to use the Internet (odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 3.4-13.0). CONCLUSIONS: Although women younger than 65 years reported greater Internet use when compared to women 65 years or older, most of older women also used the Internet.